#4 Werner Heisenberg

Video Thumbnail

Werner Hei­sen­berg had a whirl­wind career. He achie­ved his doc­to­ra­te at the age of 21 and his ha­bi­li­ta­ti­on at 22. When he was 25, he became Pro­fes­sor of Theo­re­ti­cal Physics at Leipzig Uni­ver­si­ty, and at the age of 30 he was awarded the Nobel Prize by the Swedish Academy for the crea­ti­on of quantum me­cha­nics. The lecture do­cu­men­ted here in an audio re­cord­ing is the one Hei­sen­berg de­li­ve­r­ed at the of­fi­ci­al opening of the annual con­fe­rence of the Ba­va­ri­an Academy of Fine Arts on July 9, 1970, shortly before he retired as Di­rec­tor of the Max Planck In­sti­tu­te for Physics. This is not a leisu­rely of­fi­ci­al opening speech. Hei­sen­berg rattles through his theo­ries at the speed of his thoughts. A typical cha­rac­te­ris­tic of this late phase of Hei­sen­berg’s aca­de­mic career is in evi­dence here: his in­te­rest in phi­lo­so­phi­cal ques­ti­ons, which he likes to ap­proach from a ma­the­ma­ti­cal angle.

At the start of his lecture, Hei­sen­berg in­tro­du­ces two de­fi­ni­ti­ons of beauty from an­ti­qui­ty: A thing is be­au­ti­ful because of the harmony of its parts; and a thing is be­au­ti­ful because of the splendor of the phe­no­me­non as a whole. This second de­fi­ni­ti­on comes from Plo­ti­nus and was sub­se­quent­ly adopted by Plato and Py­tha­go­ras. Hei­sen­berg goes on to show that these de­fi­ni­ti­ons of beauty also apply to work in the natural sci­en­ces, and have done since the dawn of the modern age. This is because they are con­nec­ted with the ma­the­ma­ti­cal foun­da­ti­ons of the natural sci­en­ces – in as­tro­no­mi­c­al and phy­si­cal re­se­arch since Galileo and Kepler, and in che­mi­stry and biology since the late 18th century. The power of ma­the­ma­tics lies in its ability to “unfold abs­tract struc­tures", in other words to unlock in­ter­nal rules of natural phe­no­me­na that cannot be de­tec­ted from em­pi­ri­cal ob­ser­va­tions.

Ma­the­ma­ti­cal “mo­de­ling”, as it is known today, enables us to un­der­stand in­tel­lec­tual­ly certain pat­terns of natural phe­no­me­na. Hei­sen­berg com­pa­res them to Carl Jung’s ar­che­ty­pes of the human un­con­scious. These are re­gu­lar­ly re­cur­ring fun­da­men­tal struc­tures that cor­re­spond to the two de­fi­ni­ti­ons of beauty that Hei­sen­berg men­tio­ned at the start of his lecture – because of their sym­me­try and the harmony between their parts, but also because of their ideal cha­rac­ter. Beauty is not in­con­sis­tent with exac­t­ness; sci­en­ti­fic thin­king and in­tui­ti­ve ex­pe­ri­ence of ae­s­the­tic struc­tures are more closely related than one might think at first glance. What they have in common is both the re­gu­la­ri­ty that is un­lo­cked by ma­the­ma­tics and the in­con­clu­si­veness of every human re­flec­tion on natural and spi­ri­tu­al phe­no­me­na, which is what scho­l­ar­ship aims to explore. It is this sur­pri­sing common ground that Hei­sen­berg talks about in this short but pro­found lecture, de­li­ve­r­ed in Munich in July 1970.

Peter-André Alt

Date July 9, 1970
Length 29 mins
Title, series The Meaning of Beauty in Exact Natural Science, annual con­fe­rence of the Ba­va­ri­an Academy of Fine Arts 
Lan­guage German
Audio Ba­va­ri­an Academy of Fine Arts